[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad change to tooltip.el
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: bad change to tooltip.el |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:07:39 -0500 |
I know, but I think the better solution is that in
byte-compile-callargs-warn, instead of using fboundp, we should track the
function name through load-history and things like that to see whether it
will be available at runtime, given the set of requires specified in
the file.
Would someone like to try implementing this?
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, (continued)
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/16
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/16
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/17
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/17
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/19
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/20
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/22
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/22