[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: adaptive-fill bug?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: adaptive-fill bug? |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:17:34 -0400 |
2. it rejects fill-prefixes guessed by adaptive-fill-mode if they are longer
than a line of text (longer than the difference between fill-column and
left-margin).
The second part is the crucial one and should be 100% uncontroversial.
I agree.
The first part should be harmless as well: such a check used to be done on
both the first and the second line of a paragraph. I removed the check on
the first line several years ago because it introduced a bug, and moved the
paragraph-start check further down, just before returning. This late-check
also makes the second check unnecessary.
I don't follow the logic here; I don't see why it is unnecessary.
- adaptive-fill bug?, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/06/07
- Re: adaptive-fill bug?, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/06/07
- Re: adaptive-fill bug?, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/06/09
- Re: adaptive-fill bug?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/09
- Re: adaptive-fill bug?, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/06/09
- Re: adaptive-fill bug?, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/10
- Re: adaptive-fill bug?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/10
- Re: adaptive-fill bug?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: adaptive-fill bug?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/12
- Re: adaptive-fill bug?, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/13
- Re: adaptive-fill bug?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/13
- Re: adaptive-fill bug?, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/06/13