[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: face cache referred to but not explained
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: face cache referred to but not explained |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Jun 2006 22:15:51 +0300 |
> Cc: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> From: address@hidden (Kim F. Storm)
> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:27:41 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> >> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 14:22:24 -0700
> >>
> >> It's an obscure internal detail that is of no interest neither to
> >> users nor to Lisp programmers.... Why a cache is needed in this
> >> particular case and how it is managed, are issues that no one
> >> except redisplay hackers should care about.
> >>
> >> Then why is it mentioned in the Elisp manual (node Font Selection)?
> >>
> >> If it's mentioned, it should be described a bit; otherwise, let's pull it
> >> out.
> >
> > It's fine with me to remove it from elisp.texi.
>
> Me too.
Richard, is it okay to remove the description of clear-face-cache from
the node Font Selection?
- face cache referred to but not explained, Drew Adams, 2006/06/03
- Re: face cache referred to but not explained, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/05
- RE: face cache referred to but not explained, Drew Adams, 2006/06/05
- Re: face cache referred to but not explained, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/06/05
- RE: face cache referred to but not explained, Drew Adams, 2006/06/05
- Re: face cache referred to but not explained, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/06/05
- Re: face cache referred to but not explained, Kim F. Storm, 2006/06/06
- Re: face cache referred to but not explained,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: face cache referred to but not explained, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/06
- Re: face cache referred to but not explained, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/06/07