[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple runs of menu-bar-update-hook
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Multiple runs of menu-bar-update-hook |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:25:56 -0400 |
You can see that both calls have come via redisplay(); the difference is
their callers. (Of course both runs of the hook are unnecessary, they have
been carried out because windows_or_buffers_changed = 1.) In the first:
Normally, windows_or_buffers_changed gets cleared near the end of
redisplay_internal. Did the first call to redisplay_internal do that?
If not, why not?
If it did that, where did it get set again
before the second call to redisplay?
- RE: Multiple runs of menu-bar-update-hook, Marshall, Simon, 2006/08/07
- RE: Multiple runs of menu-bar-update-hook, Marshall, Simon, 2006/08/09
- RE: Multiple runs of menu-bar-update-hook, Marshall, Simon, 2006/08/09
- RE: Multiple runs of menu-bar-update-hook, Marshall, Simon, 2006/08/10
- Re: Multiple runs of menu-bar-update-hook,
Richard Stallman <=
- RE: Multiple runs of menu-bar-update-hook, Marshall, Simon, 2006/08/11
- RE: Multiple runs of menu-bar-update-hook, Marshall, Simon, 2006/08/14