[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: display problem
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: display problem |
Date: |
Tue, 29 May 2007 13:15:56 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> I think this way of merging a face and a character code in a single
> number is a kludge, a relic of an old era when Emacs didn't have any
> other way to put faces on the text, and we intended to remove this at
> some point. Maybe Emacs 23 is that point. We now have text
> properties and overlays, so we shouldn't be needing this.
We have discussed this before; there are still uses for glyph codes
which aren't solved by text properties or overlays. The example I know
about is display tables.
Perhaps another, better mechanism will come along which will supplant
glyph codes entirely, but there isn't one yet (AFAIK).
-Miles
--
I'm beginning to think that life is just one long Yoko Ono album; no rhyme
or reason, just a lot of incoherent shrieks and then it's over. --Ian Wolff
- Re: display problem, (continued)
- Re: display problem, Jason Rumney, 2007/05/28
- Re: display problem, Miles Bader, 2007/05/28
- Re: display problem, Kenichi Handa, 2007/05/28
- RE: display problem, Drew Adams, 2007/05/28
- Re: display problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/28
- Re: display problem, Kenichi Handa, 2007/05/28
- Re: display problem, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/29
- Re: display problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/29
- Re: display problem,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: display problem, Kim F. Storm, 2007/05/29
- Re: display problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/29
- Re: display problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/29
- Re: display problem, David Kastrup, 2007/05/30
- Re: display problem, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/28
- Re: display problem, Jason Rumney, 2007/05/28
- RE: display problem, Drew Adams, 2007/05/28