Re: Privileges and practicalities [was: Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el]

[Arthur Miller]

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>   > No, they are not at all. They are quite precise. If you fail to not
>   > understand what "promote free software", "never says its users to use
>   > exclusively free software" and "never condemns people for using
>   > proprietary software" then the fail is completely on your side.
>
> That sentence is so nested that I am not sure what it means.  However,

This wasn't ment to you; this was ment to J-Louise who didn't understand
meaning of Eli's sentence which in my opinion was very clear and
concise.

> I can tell you what the GNU Project says.  The GNU Project never
> condemns people for using nonfree software and never tries to insist
> that people must use exclusively free software.

I felt that some poeple does not intepret the GNU Project the same way
as you, and that this was part of the heat in this discussion.