freetalk-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Freetalk-dev] Re: Freetalk-dev Digest, Vol 8, Issue 19


From: harsha
Subject: [Freetalk-dev] Re: Freetalk-dev Digest, Vol 8, Issue 19
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4

> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:19:19 +0200
> From: Matthias Quasthoff <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Freetalk-dev] Freetalk 1.90 [jingle version] released
> To: address@hidden
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi Vikas,
>
> Am Freitag, den 25.08.2006, 15:57 +0530 schrieb Vikas Gorur:
>> This is a "developers only" release, so there are bound to be a lot of
>> bugs ;). Please report any that you find to this list.
> I'm not sure whether I'm doing something wrong. Trying to build
> freetalk--jingle with gcc 4.1.1 I receive lot's of errors and warnings.
> For example, in order to be able to build at all I had to do
>
> ---  static const std::string XmppPump::strerror(buzz::XmppEngine::Error
> err);
> +++  static const std::string strerror(buzz::XmppEngine::Error err);
>
> in src/xmpppump.h and similar stuff in three places in
> libjingle/talk/base. After about 200 warnings I could run install and
> run freetalk, but it doesn’t display anything. gdb says
>
>> Starting program: /opt/freetalk--jingle/bin/freetalk
>> Reading symbols from shared object read from target memory...done.
>> Loaded system supplied DSO at 0x53d000
>> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
>> [New Thread -1208822064 (LWP 21048)]
>>
>>
> (waited about 20 seconds)
>> Program received signal SIGTSTP, Stopped (user).
>> [Switching to Thread -1208822064 (LWP 21048)]
>> 0x0053d402 in __kernel_vsyscall () at ../../talk/base/socket.h:112
>> 112       virtual ~Socket() {}
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0  0x0053d402 in __kernel_vsyscall () at ../../talk/base/socket.h:112
>> #1  0x0096897e in __lll_mutex_lock_wait ()
>> at ../../talk/base/socket.h:112
>> #2  0x0096522f in _L_mutex_lock_71 () at ../../talk/base/socket.h:112
>> #3  0x0096500e in pthread_mutex_lock ()
>> at ../../talk/base/socket.h:112
>> #4  0x080eccc8 in cricket::MessageQueueManager::Add (this=0x9c120e0,
>> message_queue=0x9c12060) at ../../talk/base/criticalsection.h:93
>> #5  0x080ee09f in MessageQueue (this=0x9c12060, ss=0x0) at
>> messagequeue.cc:90
>> #6  0x080efcdf in Thread (this=0x9c12060, ss=0x0) at thread.cc:99
>> #7  0x080f05e4 in ThreadManager (this=0x8157380) at thread.cc:48
>> #8  0x080f0676 in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0
>> (__initialize_p=Variable "__initialize_p" is not available.
>> ) at thread.cc:41
>> #9  0x081168a5 in __do_global_ctors_aux ()
>> #10 0x08058a8d in _init () at ../../talk/base/socket.h:112
>> #11 0x0811684e in __libc_csu_init ()
>> #12 0x005706c9 in __libc_start_main () at ../../talk/base/socket.h:112
>> #13 0x0805a001 in _start () at ../../talk/base/socket.h:112
>
> Have you experienced that?
>
Matthias,
 which version of ORTP are you using ??
> Thanks,
> Matthias
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freetalk-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetalk-dev
>
>
> End of Freetalk-dev Digest, Vol 8, Issue 19
> *******************************************
>
>






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]