If ftinspect and, potentially, other software is not going to be
built via autotools, is there a case to move to another build
system?
Well, yes. Meson will eventually become the main tool for building
FreeType, I think (or rather, it definitely won't become CMake as the
default). However, cleaning up the build system was/is a GSoC
project, so nobody else touched it in earnest. In particular, I am
not a specialist for Meson; additionally, Meson itself is still quite
a moving target.
That's a bit unsatisfactory. Personally I only use the autotools/make
to build. Also as far as I know, last I heard there is(was?) a bug of
ttdebug being mis-built by meson - it is missing a -DUNIX or something
of that sort to control the command buffering.
Yep, https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/freetype/freetype-demos/-/issues/24
I sort of feel like raising it from time to time when the GSoC
students are updating the build system "have a look at fixing that
too..." but ultimately it sounds like dumping uninteresting/tedious
work on young people.
It seems so, unfortunately.
I think Werner would respond at some point writing "patches welcome"
for building ftinspect with autotools :-).
You are reading my mind :-)
Werner