Re: [Gluster-devel] High availability doesn't exist in version 1.3 glusterfs ? (fwd)

[Kevan Benson]

I've done quite a bit of testing on this the last few months, and high 
availability configurations do work, you just need to know exactly 
what's going on when designing your configuration.  Look in the archives 
for the past 30-45 days, and you'll see quite a lot of info about HA 
configurations and how to configure them for robustness.
In short, my suggestion would be to move the unify to the client side 
and see how it works for you.
Anand Babu Periasamy wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: CityToo - Benjamin Loire <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: High availability doesn't exist in version 1.3 glusterfs ?
> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:34:44 +0100
> User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Message-Id: <address@hidden>
> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2)
>
> Without using dns round robin remote host, high availability doesn't 
> exist in version 1.3 glusterfs ?
> I test, and if I unplug eth0 of one node server, the connexion between 
> client and storage cluster is stopped !
> Why translator unify with scheduler "rr" is not able to use 
> automatically second server connexion to keep high availability ?
> Because if I have 100 nodes server and only one crashs, the storage 
> cluster becomes down !!??
> Do I have wait for version 1.4 for high availability with easy 
> translator to configure ?
> Else, how do you install easy dns round robin in local without using 
> Bind DNS?
> Benjamin LOIRE
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> .

--

-Kevan Benson
-A-1 Networks