[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al
From: |
Bastiaan Jacques |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Apr 2006 03:39:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
On Sunday 23 April 2006 02:21, strk wrote:
> I've given a quick read of your patch. It surely looks more C++ then
> it is, but maybe, if the import_info is really just an helper class
> of Movie as comments say, it could be an all-privates with Movie as a friend.
> What do others think ?
Thanks for looking at the patch! The only difference I can think of, if I
were to make the class a friend, is that the Movie class would be able to
write-access the import_info class members. That doesn't seem like much of
an issue though, and I suspect that the code will in fact be a little faster.
Although opinions tend to differ on the merits of using friend classes,
I'll go with the friend option if there are no objections.
--
Bastiaan
- [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al, Bastiaan Jacques, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al, Rob Savoye, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al, Bastiaan Jacques, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al, Rob Savoye, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al, Bastiaan Jacques, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al, Rob Savoye, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al, Bastiaan Jacques, 2006/04/22
Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al, Bastiaan Jacques, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al, strk, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al,
Bastiaan Jacques <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al, strk, 2006/04/26
- Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al, Bastiaan Jacques, 2006/04/26
- Re: [Gnash-dev] gtkglext, et al, strk, 2006/04/26