[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Boost-linkage
From: |
Markus Gothe |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Boost-linkage |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Oct 2006 16:36:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060926) |
Rob Savoye wrote:
> Markus Gothe wrote:
>
>> I think we are using the wrong approach here Rob. Do we really want to
>> *LINK* against boost when building from source. All the the code is in
>> the headers afaik. I think we should look at other projects using boost
>> on this issue, which needs further investigation.
>
> I'm new to using Boost too. I believe to use Boost headers and mutexes
> you have to link against the Boost thread library. I could be wrong, but
> if it's not needed, why build it ? I'd just as soon not have too much
> complex configuration code if it's not needed.
>
Looking at pkgsrc, they have splitted the boost-pkg so you can choose
just to install the headers (which is actually what I did on IRIX alas
compilation fails due to TU-smart pointers)...
I'll go further on this;
strk suggested earlier today that we statically link the libgnash*
libraries into the binaries which I agree on (and working on modifying
the makefiles so they conform to this as we still want the plugin to be
a DSO-binary).
//Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Gnash-dev] Boost-linkage, Markus Gothe, 2006/10/06
- [Gnash-dev] Re: Boost-linkage, Rob Savoye, 2006/10/06
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Boost-linkage,
Markus Gothe <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Boost-linkage, Rob Savoye, 2006/10/06
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Boost-linkage, Markus Gothe, 2006/10/06
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Boost-linkage, Rob Savoye, 2006/10/06
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Boost-linkage, strk, 2006/10/06
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Boost-linkage, Rob Savoye, 2006/10/06