[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs
From: |
strk |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs |
Date: |
Wed, 9 May 2007 16:28:10 +0200 |
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:25:57PM +0100, Martin Guy wrote:
> >"works fine" means no mail if everything is fine, 1 mail a day when
> >something
> >is broken.
> >
> >Fine for all ?
>
> Why, does everyone on gnash-commit have to act on it?
Ideally only whoever broke it should act on it.
I can act as a proxy trying to find out, but I tought it's easier
if every committer gets a mail and can pick it up
("hey! that must have been my fault!")
> Ok, I'll automate my build-of-every-combination stuff to that it runs
> once a night and mails everyone if any build fails, instead of looking
> into things myself.
> Oh, and I can run "make check" too and if anything new fails, mails
> everybody.
Alright, I see your point. Would rob suggestion of a new mailing list
specifically targetted at this kind of communication work for you ?
--strk;
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs, strk, 2007/05/09
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs, Rob Savoye, 2007/05/09
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs, Martin Guy, 2007/05/09
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs,
strk <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs, Rob Savoye, 2007/05/09
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs, strk, 2007/05/09
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs, Rob Savoye, 2007/05/09
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs, Martin Guy, 2007/05/09
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs, John Gilmore, 2007/05/09
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs, strk, 2007/05/09
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs, Martin Guy, 2007/05/09
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs, Martin Guy, 2007/05/09
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs, strk, 2007/05/09
- Re: [Gnash-dev] cvs tarballs, Martin Guy, 2007/05/09