[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash, Flash, Adobe, and cash
From: |
Dave Crossland |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash, Flash, Adobe, and cash |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:16:32 +0100 |
On 04/03/2008, Dossy Shiobara <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 2008.03.04, James Northcott / Chief Systems <address@hidden> wrote:
> > We understand the open source model, [...]
>
> Then I'm assuming your product is also open source, released under the
> GPL license?
That makes no sense; their product will have software released under a
range of free software licenses, and may include proprietary software
too although that would be a shame.
I expect that James understands Gnash is under the GPLv3 and what it requires.
> This is the reason why I personally use BSD-derivative licenses for my
> own projects and am not a huge fan of the GPL. YMMV, of course.
The GPL is the most business-friendly license.
http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2008/02/29/the-impact-of-licensing-choice/
explains.
--
Regards,
Dave
- [Gnash-dev] Gnash, Flash, Adobe, and cash, James Northcott / Chief Systems, 2008/03/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash, Flash, Adobe, and cash, Dossy Shiobara, 2008/03/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash, Flash, Adobe, and cash,
Dave Crossland <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash, Flash, Adobe, and cash, Rob Savoye, 2008/03/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash, Flash, Adobe, and cash, Russ Nelson, 2008/03/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash, Flash, Adobe, and cash, Rob Savoye, 2008/03/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash, Flash, Adobe, and cash, John Gilmore, 2008/03/04
- Prev by Date:
Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash, Flash, Adobe, and cash
- Next by Date:
Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash, Flash, Adobe, and cash
- Previous by thread:
Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash, Flash, Adobe, and cash
- Next by thread:
Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash, Flash, Adobe, and cash
- Index(es):