gnash-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnash-dev] "Tomeu Vizoso": Re: Flash tests


From: John Gilmore
Subject: [Gnash-dev] "Tomeu Vizoso": Re: Flash tests
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 03:06:20 -0700

FYI.  Our largest user base is hurtin'.

Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:31:24 +0200
From: "Tomeu Vizoso" <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Flash tests
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
Cc: OLPC Development <address@hidden>, address@hidden
List-Id: Software development mailing list <devel.lists.laptop.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel>,
        <mailto:address@hidden>

2008/9/16 Greg Smith <address@hidden>:
> Hi All,
>
> We need to characterize the performance and support of Flash in release 8.2.
>
> Technical people in Uruguay did a tests a while ago on the Flash games at
> this web site: http://www.minijuegos.com/
>
> They used the Gnash shipped with 656 (0.8.1-1) and a Flash plugin
> (9.0.124-0).
>
> They tested Castle Wars: http://www.minijuegos.com/juegos/jugar.php?id=5552
> Freekick Fusion http://www.minijuegos.com/juegos/html/index.php?id=4570
> Hulk Central Smahdown http://www.minijuegos.com/juegos/jugar.php?id=6769
>
> I believe those were chosen as examples of Flash capabilities. They weren't
> necessarily things the ministry of education wanted to use in class :-)
>
> In all three Gnash failed completely and Flash ran slowly.
>
> If anyone has time to try those again with the 8.2 candidate build I would
> be very interested in the results.
>
> Any other comments, URLs or examples about our Flash support are
> appreciated.

Just tried the Flash 10 RC and it's working much better. Should we ask
Uruguay to repeat their tests with that version?

Regards,

Tomeu
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]