At Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:20:45 +0930,
Karl Goetz wrote:
if you can provide proof that you have a plan for keeping it up to
date,
I wonder what would constitute such a proof? Is there a checklist
somewhere, a quiz or something? Or the package has to be maintained
for at least X months and used by at least Y users who are supposed to
"vote" for it somehow? Or perhaps there is a committee that should
decide? What criteria should be met in order to "provide proof"?
the relevant patches to builder,
I see. I was thinking of a more organized procedure, but I guess it's
too early to discuss it now.
and that it fits our guidelines (its free software),
This goes without saying.