Re: [gNewSense-users] Kernel Freedom Verification checkers required.

[Chris Andrew]

Marco,

I haven't checked the numbers, but the output in Summary.txt looks
great.  As we move beyond Drivers, the report would have to be able to
report on the rest of the work we do.  This looks fine for now.

All I need now, is a good working version of the script that Markus
did, so that we can generate a table that shows who has done what, and
we'll be looking good.

Can someone remind me where we are with that?  Forgive my stupidity.

Cheers,

Chris.

On 10/03/2008, crap0101 <address@hidden> wrote:
> hi! about the KPV script. I made this (attached to the mail). Really
>  this is not the Kpv script we want (i haven't try the Sam script but
>  reading Pitof is working on) but, for example, i use it to calculate %,
>  package number, ecc, for the sections i'm to verifing (maybe we can use
>  for large section like'char', to avoid manual counting).
>  at last, if section checked is kernel/image or the main driver's page it
>  print the table for the weekly update.
>  Following the usually formatting rules, it don't lies. if you want to
>  try is here.
>
>
>  bye
>  marco
>
>  p.s. about the "fc4" section, you see it in your kernel source? i
>  donloaded other kernel's tarball, but not see.
>
>


-- 
Reasons why you may want to try GNU/Linux:

http://www.getgnulinux.org/

A great GNU/Linux distro:

http://wiki.gnewsense.org/