Re: New version of undo-tree.el

[Vegard Øye]

On 12 Jan, 22:34, Toby Cubitt wrote:

> Indeed, although I should point out that I have no intention of
> extending it to anything remotely approaching a full VCS. There
> are full VCS's for that ;-)

I do wonder where we're headed if this catches on, which it should.
(Unfortunately, there are not too many programs with undo trees
currently.) Maybe in 2100, everyone will commit an undo tree to
their VCS rather than a file? :)

> In Emacs-22, a null argument kills the current buffer. Does the
> Windows port you're talking about also understand a null argument,
> or does it really require passing current-buffer?

(kill-buffer nil) works just fine!

Vegard