[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re[2]: [Gnucap-devel] Fwd: common_component and eval_bm_acton_base
From: |
al davis |
Subject: |
Re: Re[2]: [Gnucap-devel] Fwd: common_component and eval_bm_acton_base |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:06:48 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-trunk-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Monday 08 November 2010, address@hidden wrote:
> ad> This is incorrect because EVAL_BM_MODEL contains no
> information, ad> only placeholders. The correct values are
> in the daughter ad> object, which would be wiped out when
> the placeholder is copied ad> over it.
>
> May be we speak about different things.
> I speak about _temp_c value (as an example).
>
> It is initialized for EVAL_BM_MODEL during precalc_first()
> and then it is lost when EVAL_BM_MODEL is converted into
> EVAL_BM_SEMI_RESISTOR during expand().
>
> please test that.
I don't see it.
_temp_c in EVAL_BM_MODEL is not used, because EVAL_BM_MODEL is
only a placeholder.
The test cases I have show that the parameters are evaluated
correctly.
Can you post a test case that illustrates the problem?
bmm_res.3p.ckt
Description: Text document
bmm_res.2p.ckt
Description: Text document