[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:16:46 +0100 |
> > Come to think of it maybe we don't *need* the various test org
> > "sections"
>
> We don't need them *in their own table structure* however the the
> test org lab sections (HAEM, CHEM, MICRO, IMMUN) could be usefully
> imported into a catch-all text field if we were to add one to
> lab_requests, something like the test_result table note_provider (to
> be renamed note_test_org)
>From reading a bunch of stuff (the HL7 standard itself is not freely
available) on the web (such as http://aurora.regenstrief.org/~gunther/)
I figure that HL7 wants OBR to be what we consider lab_request to be.
I think in the first iteration we will equate the two and add fields
as necessary. IOW
> If we had a field of same or equivalent name in lab_requests, the OBR
> 024 "Diagnostic Service Section" names could update/append into here.
we will add a field lab_request.service_section.
Eventually, there is a lot of ambiguity in HL7 - v2.x was designed for
that. That's also why Mirth exists - it eases source-specific
configuration of what to do with various segments and fields.
May I suggest looking at Mirth again rather than trying to reimplement it,
poorly ?
Karsten
--
GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS.
Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail
- [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, James Busser, 2008/02/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/02/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, James Busser, 2008/02/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, James Busser, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, James Busser, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, James Busser, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings,
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, James Busser, 2008/02/14
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/02/15
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, James Busser, 2008/02/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, Dave Cramer, 2008/02/19
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/02/19
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, James Busser, 2008/02/19
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, James Busser, 2008/02/14
Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/02/26