[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc
From: |
Richard Frith-Macdonald |
Subject: |
Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 06:02:49 +0100 |
On 13 Sep 2010, at 22:24, Gregory Casamento wrote:
> If you're asking me I would say it's very unfair to make an assertion
> regarding someones work, then back out of/refuse to participate in the
> discussion which results.
Not really when it's a simple statement of fact which anyone interested could
verify by looking at svn and which David would confirm. I can see why Nicola
would not want to bother wasting time arguing about it with people who just
haven't checked for themselves.
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, (continued)
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Gregory Casamento, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Nicola Pero, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Simon Lipp, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Nicola Pero, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Gregory Casamento, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Nicola Pero, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Gregory Casamento, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Nicola Pero, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, David Chisnall, 2010/09/13
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Nicola Pero, 2010/09/14
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc,
Richard Frith-Macdonald <=
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Gregory Casamento, 2010/09/14
- Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Gregory Casamento, 2010/09/13
Re: Interesting discussion on gcc about objc, Yavor Doganov, 2010/09/14