[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD)
From: |
Philippe Roussel |
Subject: |
Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD) |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:17:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 |
Le 02/11/2012 14:50, Wolfgang Lux a écrit :
> Wolfgang Lux wrote:
[snip]
> I have implemented this. The configure script checks for the variant of
> strerror_r and the _systemError: method now contains code for the glibc
> variant of strerror_r. Doing that, I had to remove the code from common.h
> that was undefining _GNU_SOURCE and conditionally defining _XOPEN_SOURCE, as
> that could invalidate the result of the autoconf test. I tested this on both
> OS X (using the POSIX variant) and Linux (using the glibc version) and this
> seems to work. I think it should also work for systems where strerror_r is
> not defined at all and we define our own, POSIX compatible version, but I
> have no system to test this.
base compiles without problem for me now.
Thanks,
Philippe
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), (continued)
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2012/11/02
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), Wolfgang Lux, 2012/11/02
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), David Chisnall, 2012/11/02
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), Wolfgang Lux, 2012/11/02
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2012/11/02
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), Wolfgang Lux, 2012/11/02
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), Wolfgang Lux, 2012/11/02
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2012/11/02
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), Wolfgang Lux, 2012/11/02
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), Wolfgang Lux, 2012/11/02
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD),
Philippe Roussel <=
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2012/11/03
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2012/11/02
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), David Chisnall, 2012/11/02
- Re: On linux too (was Re: Base compilation broken on NetBSD), David Chisnall, 2012/11/02