[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnutls-cli return codes [was: Re: confirmation that debian #480041 i
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: gnutls-cli return codes [was: Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce] |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:46:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) |
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Fri 2008-11-21 02:24:02 -0500, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>
>> Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>
>>> *** Non fatal error: Rehandshake was requested by the peer.
>>> *** Fatal error: A TLS fatal alert has been received.
>>> *** Received alert [10]: Unexpected message
>>> *** Server has terminated the connection abnormally.
>>> ---------------------------------
>> Hello, this does not seem to be a gnutls error. The server merely
>> asks for renegotiation, gnutls-cli ignores it (legal behavior) and
>> server does not like it thus sends a fatal alert.
>
> It looks to me like gnutls-cli has a return code of 0 in this
> situation. Wouldn't it make more sense to exit with a non-zero return
> code when the server has terminated the connection abnormally?
Indeed, I've modified it to do so.
regards,
Nikos
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, (continued)
Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/21
Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/21
Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Joe Orton, 2008/11/21
gnutls-cli return codes [was: Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce], Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/21
- Re: gnutls-cli return codes [was: Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce],
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <=