[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:08:43 -0700 |
Yo Beat!
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:33:34 +0200
Beat Bolli <address@hidden> wrote:
> > This seems to imply that the PPS unit is .1 rather than .0.
> >
> This is correct, but I was assuming that the PPS doesn't have to be
> fudged, because it is directly connected to the kernel PPS via an
> interrupt.
There is an offset, but likely WAY smaller than can be measured off network
chimers.
> I have a fudge offset only on the GPS unit, and none on the
> PPS. This seems to make sense to me, because only the NMEA stuff is
> delayed by the RS232 transmission.
Hard core folks will have several PPS sources on the host. Then adjust
the fudge to make them all agree. I have seen several uSec offset
between brands of serial PPS.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97701
address@hidden Tel:+1(541)382-8588
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script,
Gary E. Miller <=
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/10/22
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Hal Murray, 2013/10/23
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Gary E. Miller, 2013/10/23
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Dave Platt, 2013/10/23
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Gary E. Miller, 2013/10/23
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/10/23