Re: [gpsd-dev] [PATCH] Improved resilience in gps_shm_close() in case it is called after an unsuccessful gps_shm_open()

[Hal Murray]

> And when I do that, I prefer the constant on the LEFT side.  I find
> it allows the compiler to catch some non-obvious errors.
> But that drives Eric batty, so avoid that for now.  :-)

I thought Eric had learned to live with that.  I hope he speaks up.

I do a double take when I see it, but I smile as soon as I figure out what's 
going on and that doesn't take long.  I figure I'll get used to it before 
long, sooner if more people use it.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.