gpsd-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gpsd-dev] GPSD Shared Memory Flags


From: Franco Diego
Subject: Re: [gpsd-dev] GPSD Shared Memory Flags
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:41:21 -0700 (PDT)

Hello guys,

I sent an email before with attachment and was scrubbed by the email server. I'm
checking the "set" flags in gps_data_t data struct when using shared memory and
I'm getting inconsistencies.

I setup GPSD in a beaglebone and "cgps" module works fine, I'm using the C++
libgpsmm library where I can read GPS position and time through the gps_data_t
data structure, however when it comes to check the "set" flags in gps_data_t,
these flags are not being set for every packet as follows:


-----Shared Memory:

1. For the below packet (retrieved every second), the STATUS_SET is the only
flag on in "set" member of the gps_data_t data structure, and I see that lat,
long, time, etc changes and still no more flags get set in "set" flag.

{"class:":"TPV","tag":"RMC","device":"...."......         

set flag : '0b1000000000'


2. For the below packet ( retrieved every 5 seconds), the "set" member in
gps_data_t data structure is:

{"class:":"SKY","tag":"GSV","device":"...."......

set flag : '0b10000000001000100000000010'


-----Sockets:

1. When I test the code with sockets instead of shared memory,  for the
following packet (retrieved every second), the flags seem to look OK, since they
lat, long, etc flags are set

{"class:":"TPV","tag":"RMC","device":"...."......        

set flag: '0b10000001010011011111111100'


2. For the below packet (retrieved every 5 seconds), the set member in
gps_data_t struct is:

{"class:":"SKY","tag":"GSV","device":"...."......

set flag : '0b10000001011011011111111100'


Do you know why when testing with shared memory why the TIME_SET, LATLON_SET,
ALTITUDE_SET, SPEED_SET, etc set flags in gps_data_t are not being set even
though I'm getting updates on the shared memory (different data every second)?
this works with sockets as shown above.

Thank you!

Diego



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]