[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpsd g10de777bb vs Jackson Labs Micro JLT
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: gpsd g10de777bb vs Jackson Labs Micro JLT |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Aug 2021 08:04:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (berkeley-unix) |
"Daniel O'Connor" <darius@dons.net.au> writes:
> I don't have the spec either but FWIW the ublox docs talk about such
> numbers if it's in a particular mode.
Two comments on NMEA specs:
They are not secret, merely copyrighted, so they are available in the
open standards sense, just not in practice accesible to people without
a lot of spare money. It would be useful if someone on the list has
access to it perhaps via a university or corporate library who could
comment on what it says.
I find that the u-blox F9P spec gives information on what that
receiver outputs, including talking about varying NMEA versions. So
it seems also like an NMEA spec, in a not-100%-reliable sort of way.
>> You may wish to report to JL their non-standard message construction.
My impression from the time-nuts list is that Jackon Labs is an outfit
that aims to do things right, and that it's a company run by engineers.
So writing to them and saying your are having this issue and asking
about it seems entirely reasonable and likely to be met with a
reasonable response.
My impression at the moment is that there are micro versions of NMEA
slightly different as the world struggles to move from 2 constellations
(GPS/GLONASS + SBAS) to more. The F9P section on this seems very
useful.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature