[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [groff] 01/04: ChangeLog: Wrap long lines.
From: |
Keith Marshall |
Subject: |
Re: [groff] 01/04: ChangeLog: Wrap long lines. |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Oct 2021 08:56:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.1 |
Seriously, Branden?
On 03/10/2021 14:20, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> gbranden pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository groff.
>
> commit fc6989ae19146294bcf27d08453c6005a8b363c5
> Author: G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
> AuthorDate: Sun Oct 3 22:48:48 2021 +1100
>
> ChangeLog: Wrap long lines.
Why do you waste your time, indulging in such asinine whimsy? Why
introduce a commit which contributes absolutely zero value?
The ChangeLog entry, which you modified, was already 100% compliant with
established GNU convention; I know this, because it was I who wrote it.
I know that the lines were NOT excessively long, because I edited it in
vim, with the default filetype plug-in for changelog active; this
GUARANTEES that the lines are wrapped to a sane length (78 chars max),
which is consistent with GNU convention.
Pursuant to our recent discussion regarding ChangeLog files, if you are
going to indulge in such futility, why should I even bother to update
the ChangeLog at all? I may as well just provide the detail in the git
commit message, and delegate the ChangeLog file update entirely to you.
The sooner we deprecate free-standing ChangeLog files, the better, IMO.
- Re: [groff] 01/04: ChangeLog: Wrap long lines.,
Keith Marshall <=