[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scripting support (PATCH)
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: Scripting support (PATCH) |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Oct 2005 13:55:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.2 |
On Sunday 30 October 2005 10:45 am, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Right, I felt it hard to explain the direction I'd like to take on
> this list. So I have implemented the core functionality because that
> definitely has to be right.
I don't know what direction you would like yet. It is hard to figure out all
of your ideas from the implementation. I only know that it is differently
implemented.
> > - What are disadvantages in Vladimir's implementation?
>
> In my opinion it is not clean enough and does not integrate with GRUB
> like I would like it to. And Vladimir's patch was way too hard to
> maintain when I started working on this a week ago.
Can you elaborate on those points? I still don't understand.
> > - What are disadvantages in Marco's implementation?
> >
> > Fewer features are implemented. The kernel is bloated.
>
> What do you mean with the kernel is bloated? My patch moves a lot of
> responsibility to commands. I would say it is less bloated.
I mentioned this, because your parser is built into the kernel. This is
unnecessary, as the rescue mode does not need fancy features.
Okuji
Re: Scripting support (PATCH), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/10/31
Re: Scripting support (PATCH), Hollis Blanchard, 2005/10/30