Re: Let core developers "vote" to accept patches.

[Johan Rydberg]

"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <address@hidden> writes:

> Our rules are:
>
> - When you are a committer and a patch is trivial enough, you can
> (and should) check in the patch by yourself.
>
> - If not, you should ask others in grub-devel.

It was for these two scenarios I suggested we could vote on patches.
But it might not be needed.  I was after all just a suggestion.

> - I retain final words as the designer of GRUB 2. For some certain
> parts, I completely rely on other developers. For instance, Hollis
> would even precede me in PowerPC-specific changes.

Agreed.

> - If a change is involved with political issues, official
> maintainers must approve or disapprove. This is required for the GNU
> Project.

Of course.

~j