[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: 1.97 roadmap
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: 1.97 roadmap |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:21:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hi Yves,
Please could you include plain text in your mail? HTML-only is difficult
to quote (see below)
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 02:26:47PM +0200, Yves Blusseau wrote:
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
> <html>
> <head>
> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
> </head>
> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
> Colin Watson a écrit :
> <blockquote cite="mid:address@hidden" type="cite">
> <pre wrap="">On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 02:43:34AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> </pre>
> <blockquote type="cite">
> <pre wrap="">On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 07:10:12PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder'
> Serbinenko wrote:
> </pre>
> <blockquote type="cite">
> <pre wrap="">What about savedefault? Which savedefault way you prefer?
> </pre>
> </blockquote>
> <pre wrap="">I think it would be good to have. But I haven't followed on
> the savedefault
> discussion, I just know it would build upon the existing envfile support.
> </pre>
> </blockquote>
> <pre wrap=""><!---->
> I thought Vladimir's general approach in
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
> href="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2009-06/msg00002.html">http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2009-06/msg00002.html</a>
> was
> just fine (nice and simple, no fancy event handling, builds on existing
> facilities), although I agree with the suggestions from Robert/Pavel
> that the save step should be a single command/function.
> </pre>
> </blockquote>
> I use the vladimir patch in my grub and it work like a charm. I think
> it's a good approach too.<br>
> <br>
> Yves Blusseau<br>
> </body>
> </html>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
Re: RFC: 1.97 roadmap, Michal Suchanek, 2009/08/10
Re: RFC: 1.97 roadmap, Colin Watson, 2009/08/12