Re: [PATCH] nested partitions

[Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Robert Millan<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:14:45PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> On Robert's request I write about the usage cases I'm aware. It's by
>> no means complete
>>
>> 1) bsdlabel on PC-style. By most *BSD flavours
>> 2) sunpc on PC-style. By Solaris
>> 3) Some kind on PC-style on PC-style by Minix. (not sure about this
>> one -it was a long time ago)
>> I vaguely heard of (I may be completely wrong):
>> 4) amiga on PC-style by AROS
>> 5) sun on apple. Polaris (?)
>
> Can someone confirm the third one?  It's the only one that breaks the
> "contained label inside container label" pattern.
4 and 5 would break this pattern as well. Amiga and Sun are used
standalone on corresponding systems.
>
> --
> Robert Millan
>
>  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
>  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
>  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>



-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko

Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git