Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC

[Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko]

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paolo Bonzini<address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>> #include<stdio.h>
>>>
>>> void foo (int a, int b, void (*hook) (int aa, int bb, int cc))
>>> {
>>>  b += a;
>>>  hook (a, b, a + b);
>>> }
>>>
>>> void qq (int a)
>>> {
>>>  auto void q1 (int aa, int bb, int cc);
>>>  void q1 (int aa, int bb, int cc)
>>>    {
>>>      printf ("%d %d %d\n", a, aa + bb, cc);
>>>    }
>>>
>>>  foo (a, a + 1, q1);
>>> }
>>>
>>> int main()
>>> {
>>>  qq (10);
>>> }
>>>
>>> Compile with:
>>> gcc -m32 -mregparm=3 -Os test.c
>>>
>>> ./a.out
>>> 10 31 -6674368
>
> Ok, this was the only important part of the message to us GCC hackers. :-)
>
> Can you please report a bug in bugzilla, saying which versions work and
> which fail?  Also can you write in the report what was your analysis with
> respect to regparm?
Done by Robert Millan here: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41246
>
> Thanks!
>
> Paolo
>



-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko

Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git