[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :)
From: |
Ram Pai |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :) |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Apr 2014 10:47:35 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 06:28:51AM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> В Thu, 3 Apr 2014 13:32:22 -0700
> Ram Pai <address@hidden> пишет:
>
> >
> > They generate a 32bit BE grub binary on a LE system? No. I dont think
> > so. Because the cross-compile tool chain is not enabled do so.
> >
>
> address@hidden:/tmp/binaries> file usr/bin/grub2-mkimage
> usr/bin/grub2-mkimage: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, 64-bit PowerPC or cisco
> 7500, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux
> 3.0.0, BuildID[sha1]=4a9b7759e1c41a2b2de9f4d33bc179186bf04f8f, stripped
> address@hidden:/tmp/binaries> file usr/lib/grub2/powerpc-ieee1275/kernel.exec
> usr/lib/grub2/powerpc-ieee1275/kernel.exec: ELF 32-bit MSB executable,
> PowerPC or cisco 4500, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, not stripped
> address@hidden:/tmp/binaries>
I know Dinar had attempted and abondoned the work, because it did not work for
him.
As of now that thing is not there anymore...if you look at
openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/grub2
RP
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), (continued)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/03
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Ram Pai, 2014/04/03
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/03
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Ram Pai, 2014/04/03
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2014/04/03
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Ram Pai, 2014/04/03
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/03
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Ram Pai, 2014/04/03
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2014/04/03
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/03
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :),
Ram Pai <=
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Dinar Valeev, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Dinar Valeev, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Ram Pai, 2014/04/04
- Message not available
- Fwd: Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2014/04/05
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/05