[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gc issues
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: gc issues |
Date: |
14 Sep 2000 12:42:50 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) |
Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:
> Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Further, I don't think conservative scanning of free cells is
> > unclean.
>
> it doesn't look very problematic.
or maybe it does, after all.
when the hypothetical future kernel-threaded Guile is running on a
real multiprocessor machine, is it guaranteed that the tag in the cell
will be either the freecell tag or the target tag? i.e. is there any
memory coherence guarantee? I don't think so, but I don't know alot
about the subject.
--
A computer, to print out a fact,
Will divide, multiply, and subtract.
But this output can be
No more than debris,
If the input was short of exact.
-- Gigo
- Re: gc issues, (continued)
- Re: gc issues, Michael Livshin, 2000/09/13
- Re: gc issues, Dirk Herrmann, 2000/09/13
- Re: gc issues, Michael Livshin, 2000/09/13
- Re: gc issues, Dirk Herrmann, 2000/09/13
- Re: gc issues, Carl R. Witty, 2000/09/13
- Re: gc issues, Michael Livshin, 2000/09/13
- Re: gc issues, Carl R. Witty, 2000/09/14
- Re: gc issues, Michael Livshin, 2000/09/14
- Re: gc issues, Jim Blandy, 2000/09/15
- Re: gc issues, Michael Livshin, 2000/09/13
- Re: gc issues,
Michael Livshin <=
- Re: gc issues, Jim Blandy, 2000/09/14
- Re: gc issues, Michael Livshin, 2000/09/14
- Re: gc issues, Dirk Herrmann, 2000/09/14
- Re: gc issues, Michael Livshin, 2000/09/16
- Re: gc issues, Dirk Herrmann, 2000/09/19
- Re: gc issues, Michael Livshin, 2000/09/19
- Re: gc issues, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/09/19
- Re: gc issues, Michael Livshin, 2000/09/19
- Re: gc issues, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/09/19
- Re: gc issues, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/09/19