Re: goops C interface

[Bruce Korb]

Eric Moore wrote:
> That opens 2 questions I'll put up for comment :)
> 
> 1) do people prefer some kind of giant varargs style function that
>    defines a class, or one that takes a struct that defines it?

Varargs were rather ill-conceived.  Use structs, please.  :-)

> 2) should the API deal in SCM values (since a goops object can by
>    default hold any value) or C values (like the fdi.c and snarfing
>    system does)

Both.  Let the caller select whichever is more convenient.