Re: records as s-expressions

[Rob Browning]

Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:

> I see two choices: follow Common Lisp and use #S(<type> ...), or
> follow SRFI-10 and use something like #,(record <type> ...).  I don't
> think there is any SRFI that specifies a concrete read syntax for
> records.

And I suppose the third and most painful, though possibly most broadly
useful option (if you're feeling really ambitious) might be to try and
come up with a suitable SRFI.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592  F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4