Delivery failure (address@hidden)

[Bruce Korb]

Your message has encountered delivery problems
to the following recipient(s):

address@hidden
Delivery failed
550 Invalid address in message header

Final-Recipient: rfc822; address@hidden
Action: failed
Status: 2.0.0 (Success - no additional status information available)
Remote-MTA: dns; mx20.gnu.org
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid address in message header

Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:30:55 -0700
Subject: Re: GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Marius Vollmer wrote:

> Yes, well.  I haven't made my mind up yet, but I tend to just use
> scm_is_true and scm_is_false.  It's not a big problem to be a little
> unsymmetric, I'd say.

I'd disagree.  Any lack of symmetry requires increased knowledge
and more care in usage.  So, if ``scm_is_<type>'' is implemented
for nearly all types, then it needs to be implemented for them all.
"All types except for bool" is too hard to remember.