Re: cvs srfi-1 for-each segv

[Marius Vollmer]

Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:

> Something has broken in the srfi-1 for-each.  Eg.
>
>       (use-modules (srfi srfi-1))
>       (for-each noop '(1 2 3) '(4 5) '())
>       => seg fault


Oops, I made a small typo when changing the code to use
SCM_SIMPLE_VECTOR_REF.

2005-01-10  Marius Vollmer  <address@hidden>

        * srfi-1.c (check_args): Bugfix to change from 2005-01-02: ARGV is
        the vector to check, not ARGS.

> Bit of a trace and some printfs suggest maybe the lists are mangled
> somehow by SCM_SIMPLE_VECTOR_REF, though I don't see how.  Are you
> supposed to use that macro with an scm_vector result now?

Yes, scm_vector is guaranteed to return a simple vector, and you can
use SCM_SIMPLE_VECTOR_REF with the result.  You can also use
scm_c_vector_ref, of course, or scm_vector_elements +
scm_array_handle_release.

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405