[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SRFI 61: a more general `cond' clause
From: |
Stephen Compall |
Subject: |
Re: SRFI 61: a more general `cond' clause |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Aug 2005 22:23:51 -0500 |
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 10:00 +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> I think you should decide now if applications need to use that module
> or not. If not then may as well describe the full syntax with the
> main `cond' docs.
I went with the "not" route. As I previously wrote, code that breaks on
this would be very odd indeed.
> > +;;; srfi-6.scm --- Basic String Ports
>
> Too much cut and paste :-)
I got lazy :)
Attached is a version with the suggested doc move and no more
srfi-61.scm. Thanks for your recommendations.
Here's a new ChangeLog set, for ice-9/, doc/ref/, and libguile/
respectively:
2005-08-01 Stephen Compall <address@hidden>
* boot-9.scm (%cond-expand-features): Add srfi-61.
2005-08-01 Stephen Compall <address@hidden>
* api-control.texi (if cond case): Describe SRFI 61 cond.
* srfi-modules.texi (SRFI-61): New section.
(SRFI Support): Add SRFI-61 to menu.
2005-08-01 Stephen Compall <address@hidden>
* eval.c (scm_m_cond): Recognize SRFI 61 cond syntax.
(CEVAL): Evaluate SRFI 61 cond clauses.
--
Stephen Compall
srfi-61-4s11.patch
Description: Text Data
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part