[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm.
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm. |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 01:38:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> A minor difference regards output-port-width. The version in slib.scm
> returns 80 where the version in guile.init returns 79.
>
> A more significant question regards evaluation. In slib.scm we have:
> [...]
> where guile.init has:
> [...]
I'd say that in both cases, and in fact in all cases of overlap,
guile.init should win. Having differing definitions is clearly bad,
and since SLIB has a guile.init, we should bow to it.
Whenever we want to do things differently, we should push those
changes into SLIB.
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
- Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Rob Browning, 2005/11/16
- Future of ice-9/slib.scm., klaus schilling, 2005/11/16
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Greg Troxel, 2005/11/16
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Rob Browning, 2005/11/17
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Greg Troxel, 2005/11/18
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Marius Vollmer, 2005/11/19
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Rob Browning, 2005/11/19
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Rob Browning, 2005/11/19
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm.,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Rob Browning, 2005/11/19
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Rob Browning, 2005/11/20
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Kevin Ryde, 2005/11/20
- Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm., Rob Browning, 2005/11/20