[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default stack limit
From: |
Kevin Ryde |
Subject: |
Re: Default stack limit |
Date: |
Thu, 11 May 2006 09:58:22 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Is it just the compilers that changed,
Seems to be, it's still fine with for instance gcc 2.95 unoptimized.
gcc 4 seems to use up a lot more stack in CEVAL()/DEVAL() when
unoptimized, something like 900 bytes for me, but why that's so I
couldn't tell. (Keeping stack usage in that func to a minimum would
probably be a good thing in general though, as the main recursion when
interpreting ...)
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Miroslav Lichvar, 2006/05/05
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Miroslav Lichvar, 2006/05/06
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Marius Vollmer, 2006/05/07
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Andy Wingo, 2006/05/08
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Marius Vollmer, 2006/05/08
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Neil Jerram, 2006/05/09
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Andy Wingo, 2006/05/09
- Default stack limit, Marius Vollmer, 2006/05/09
- Re: Default stack limit, Andy Wingo, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default stack limit,
Kevin Ryde <=