[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Text collation
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Text collation |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:43:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> I don't think this is actually the case: there are currently 4
>> shared libraries in the `srfi' directory, but none of them is
>> documented in the manual and the C functions they export are not
>> mentioned either (that's what I meant by "practically preclude":
>> it's technically possible to use them but it's not documented).
>
> Actually, in general, the SRFI scm_* functions are intended for public
> use. If not, then all of the relevant scm_* functions would/should
> have been named scm_i_*.
>
> Also, you definitely can't judge by the presence or lack of
> documentation. Guile's documentation has often taken a while to catch
> up with the code.
I'm not sure I agree with that. I accept that documentation can
sometimes take a while to catch up (although it shouldn't, and
recently I think we've all been pretty good about writing doc at the
same time as developing something), but in principle I think "presence
in the manual" is a better way of indicating to users whether an API
is officially supported than a coding convention.
Regards,
Neil
- Re: Text collation, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/10/22
- Re: Text collation, Rob Browning, 2006/10/22
- Re: Text collation, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/10/23
- Re: Text collation, Rob Browning, 2006/10/24
- Re: Text collation, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/10/25
- Re: Text collation, Rob Browning, 2006/10/25
- Re: Text collation, Neil Jerram, 2006/10/25
- Re: Text collation, Rob Browning, 2006/10/25
- Re: Text collation, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/10/26
- Re: Text collation,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: Text collation, Rob Browning, 2006/10/25
Re: Text collation, Neil Jerram, 2006/10/25