Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses

[Klaus Schilling]

From: address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès)
Subject: Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:02:37 +0100

> Hi Andreas,
> 
> Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > You should probably also have a look at the Scheme-Level FFI of PLT
> > Scheme[1], and my reimplementation for Scheme 48[2].
> 
> Thanks for the links, that's the kind of think I had in mind.  Perhaps
> you'd like to port S42 to Guile as well?  :-)
> 
> BTW, there's one small potential issue with the dynamic construction of
> function calls like this: it's almost impossible to catch API/ABI
> inconsistencies beforehand.

this makes the whole FFI stuff absurd.
There's absolutely no alternative to an elaborate C API
as guile's, and hand-written library wrappers.

   Klaus Schilling