Re: srfi-18 and the vm

[Ludovic Courtès]

¡Hola!

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> I'm catching up with mail. On my syncase-in-boot-9 branch, I enabled
> compilation of srfi-18 and fixed a bug in it regarding multiple-value
> returns. Now I just ran the srfi-18 test like 100 times in a row and it
> didn't show any strange errors. Yaaaay!

What kind of "strange errors" would it lead to before?

When SRFI-18 wasn't compiled, I would expect multiple value returns
would translate in a `value.c' struct that would then be passed along as
a single value.

Thanks,
Ludo'.