guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Compiled load path issues


From: Andy Wingo
Subject: Re: Compiled load path issues
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:16:44 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux)

On Sun 18 Oct 2009 17:36, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Once upon a time, if ‘chbouib.go’ is in the vicinity of ‘chbouib.scm’,
> then ‘(use-modules (chbouib))’ would load ‘chbouib.go’.  This is no
> longer the case, but can be remedied with something like this:
>
> diff --git a/libguile/load.c b/libguile/load.c
> index 50af256..194d1e5 100644
> --- a/libguile/load.c
> +++ b/libguile/load.c
> @@ -726,7 +726,9 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_primitive_load_path, 
> "primitive-load-path", 0, 0, 1,
>      exception_on_not_found = SCM_BOOL_T;
>  
>    full_filename = scm_sys_search_load_path (filename);
> -  compiled_filename = scm_search_path (*scm_loc_load_compiled_path,
> +  compiled_filename = scm_search_path (scm_append
> +                                     (scm_list_2 
> (*scm_loc_load_compiled_path,
> +                                                  *scm_loc_load_path)),
>                                         filename,
>                                         *scm_loc_load_compiled_extensions,
>                                         SCM_BOOL_T);
>
> Andy: can you comment?  What was the idea behind
> ‘%load-compiled-path’?

The idea is that given that the compiled files are
architecture-dependent, that they should go in $libdir instead of
$datadir. We can add $libdir, but I don't think it's a good idea -- not
only for reasons of excessive stat, but because I don't think we should
be putting binaries in with installed source.

> Besides, ‘scm_search_path ()’ was changed incompatibly compared to 1.8
> in 22f4ee48822db5e30df3abf9a11b6066f2bab9d3.  I’m wary about such
> incompatibilities and would like it if we could (1) list them, and
> (2) avoid them unless we really really can’t think of any other way.  In
> this particular case, do you have an idea on how to avoid it?

I don't really know. I'm sure it could be worked around somehow, but
it's not very fun work.

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]