[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:27:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Greets
On Wed 14 Jul 2010 00:09, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Just to make sure, did you read the figures right? With the debug
> engine, the slowdown is noticeable.
Yes, I saw the numbers :)
> AFAICS the only difference between the two engine is VM_USE_HOOKS.
> Hooks are only used in (system vm coverage) at this point, so we don’t
> lose much by disabling them.
Tracing and call-counting profiling too. They will be used when stepping soon.
>> At the very least, one should be able to switch VMs.
>
> You mean switch VMs for the code being executed?
Yes.
> (For code to be
> executed than can already be done using ‘vm-apply’.)
That would only apply until a function was subsequently called from C.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/12
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/13
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/13
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/13
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/14
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/15
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/19
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/20
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/20
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/21
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/20