[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The progress of hacking guile and prolog
From: |
Noah Lavine |
Subject: |
Re: The progress of hacking guile and prolog |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:13:17 -0500 |
Yes, that's right. I was unclear. I am intending to come up with a
language that I can compile to C, to implement VM instructions. I
meant I would compile something to C, not from it to machine code.
Just to clarify, it probably won't be a subset of Scheme (although one
could compile a subset of Scheme to this language). I was thinking of
something more like register transfer language, so the compiler will
be very simple.
Noah
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Noah Lavine <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On a completely different note, I'm now looking at writing a compiler
>> for a subset of C, which could eventually become a JIT compiler. If we
>> could attach your GLIL->C compiler to that, it could produce a full
>> Scheme->machine code compiler in Guile.
>
> Interesting. I thought you were going rather to compile a subset of
> Scheme to C, which could be used to implement VM instructions, no?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
>
>
- Re: The progress of hacking guile and prolog, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/11/03
- Re: The progress of hacking guile and prolog, Noah Lavine, 2010/11/03
- Re: The progress of hacking guile and prolog, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2010/11/10
- Re: The progress of hacking guile and prolog, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/11/11
- Typechecking I, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2010/11/15
- Re: The progress of hacking guile and prolog, Andy Wingo, 2010/11/20
- Re: The progress of hacking guile and prolog, Noah Lavine, 2010/11/23
- Re: The progress of hacking guile and prolog, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2010/11/24
- piper schemigan, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2010/11/24
- Re: piper schemigan, Andreas Rottmann, 2010/11/24
- Re: piper schemigan, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/11/25
- Re: piper schemigan, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2010/11/26