[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ECMAScript support broken?
From: |
Noah Lavine |
Subject: |
Re: ECMAScript support broken? |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:54:25 -0500 |
Hello,
> I got the same answer (previous mail), I should check mail before send it ;-)
I like your use of @implv, though.
> I plan to run some ecmascript test suite as well as the library I want
> to use in my project. Do you know how to run guile as a ecmascript
> interpreter from command line?
If you mean give guile a '.js' file have it interpret that with
ecmascript, then I think it's not possible right now, although I
suspect that such a feature could be added easily.
If you have a file that you only want to use with Guile, though, you
might be able to put ",L 'ecmascript" as the first line.
Noah
- ECMAScript support broken?, Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/02
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/02
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/03
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/03
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?,
Noah Lavine <=
- Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/04
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/17
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/26
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/26
- Re: Sputnik test result, Andy Wingo, 2011/01/27