[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sputnik test result
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: Sputnik test result |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:08:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Kan-Ru,
On Tue 04 Jan 2011 10:23, Kan-Ru Chen <address@hidden> writes:
> I ran the sputniktests[1] from google using the attached guile-es-parse
> script, which only tests the parser.
>
> === Summary ===
> - Ran 5246 tests
> - Passed 4410 tests (84.1%)
> - Failed 836 tests (15.9%)
Excellent test case! I just ran the tests again, with the recent
patches, and we have:
=== Summary ===
- Ran 5246 tests
- Passed 4655 tests (88.7%)
- Failed 591 tests (11.3%)
So an improvement, but still quite a ways to go. I think the ones that
were fixed are the unicode errors that you mentioned:
> Where the failed tests have
>
> - 245 unicode errors (unicode literal is not supported)
> - 393 rbrace errors (see below)
> - 39 Math.LN2 errors (see below)
> - 159 remain to sort out
So we are left with the rest of them to sort out. Then of course to
actually compile them, eh...
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, (continued)
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/03
- Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/04
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/17
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/26
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/26
- Re: Sputnik test result,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: Sputnik test result, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/27
- Re: Sputnik test result, Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/27
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/03
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/03
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/04
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/04
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/04
Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/03