Re: add-relative-load-path ?

[Andy Wingo]

On Wed 25 Jan 2012 21:41, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

>>>>> What about calling it ‘current-file-name’ instead?
>>>>
>> We can still change it if it's the right thing, but we would probably
>> need to do the same with the other interfaces (with the deprecation
>> dance).
>
> Right.  Or we could keep both, for those that already existed?  (Just
> like some software packages have both “color” and “colour” in their
> API.)

To me that does not make sense.  If we prefer one, then we deprecate the
other.  IMO anyway :)  I have no preference here, except overall
consistency.

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/